Editor’s Note: This is part two in our five-part series looking at the3.6.7 Using host drives. File-level cloning is required when reducing or enlarging the size of FAT/FAT32 volumes and when reducing the size of NTFS. See Switching On Disk Pre-Allocation for Flat Target virtual Disks (KB 1008300) for details. Parallels Desktop for Microsoft Windows and Mac OS x 2.5, 3.0 2 StorageCraft ShadowProtect 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.1, and 3.2 3.Best software for running Windows on Intel-based Macs.Partition, and after a couple of minutes the operation will finish and the partition will be expanded. While Parallels Image Tool can expand your virtual hard drive, the. You Mac users virtualizing Windows with Parallels can expand XPs C: drive size using the free GParted Live CD. 3.6.8 Virtual FAT disk images 3.6.9 NBD access 3.6.10 Sheepdog disk images.Parallels For Mac Enlarging The Windows Drive Allocation Download Parallels Desktop 9 For Mac Free Parallels Desktop For Mac Activation Key Parallels For Mac Ebay.
![]() Parallels Enlarging The Windows Drive Allocation Mac OS X And BackSoftware supportAssuming that you’re using Parallels to run Windows, you’ll want to check out Parallels’ Coherence mode as soon as you can (see “Coherence Mode”). You’ll then have to specify a memory allocation and drive-space setup for your virtual machine, and then start the installation—you can install from CDs or from a disk image. On the next screen, you select the type of OS (Linux, OS/2, and so on), as well as the specific version (Red Hat Linux, OS/2 Warp 4, and so on) you want to install. You use File: New to open the OS Installation Assistant, and tell it to create a Custom virtual machine. Parallels Tools adds a number of features that ease the integration of Windows with OS X, such as the ability to move your mouse seamlessly from Parallels to Mac OS X and back again.The process is just a bit more complicated if you want to install other operating systems. Installer for mac and windowsWhen you want to get back to your native OS, just press option-return and you’re back in windowed mode.In addition to creating this OS transparency, Parallels runs Windows apps amazingly well. In full-screen mode, the Mac OS is completely hidden. You can copy a folder of files from one environment to the other, add items to the taskbar in Coherence mode, and even drop documents onto Windows’ application windows.At the other extreme, you can make your Mac look like it’s solely a Windows machine simply by switching to full-screen mode. When running Parallels in Coherence mode, it’s easy to forget you’re even running the Windows OS it’s more like you’re running programs that don’t look like the rest of your OS X apps.Further easing integration, Parallels supports full drag and drop between the Windows and OS X environments. Those apps have their own resizable windows, their icons appear in OS X’s Dock, and the Windows taskbar is present along the bottom of the screen (though you can drag it to any edge, just as you can when running Windows natively). Even playing back DVDs works reasonably well. Performance is nice and snappy—in fact, it’s the snappiest of the four programs I tested (see “How They Compare: Virtualization Software”). And Parallels won’t run 64-bit Windows, but that’ll be a problem for only a small subset of users.For everything else, such as Microsoft Office, Quicken QuickBooks, Adobe Photoshop, and pretty much any other application I tested, Parallels works, and works well. Also, Parallels doesn’t yet offer accelerated graphics, so many games are out of the question. So if you’re running an application that’s particularly CPU-intensive, it’ll take a bit of a performance hit. (You can also run Windows XP from a Boot Camp partition—meaning that you need only one copy of Windows XP.) I sayBecause Parallels can’t yet utilize both cores in the Core Duo chips. But if you need accelerated 3-D graphics support or have FireWire and Bluetooth devices you need to use in Windows, look to Boot Camp. Who it’s good forWith its excellent application support, well-integrated Coherence mode, drag-and-drop capabilities, and overall level of performance, Parallels is a great match for people who need to run the full Windows OS on their Macs— or people who’d like to experiment with other operating systems, such as Linux. In my experience, that didn’t interfere with performance much, but if you have processor-intensive Windows apps, it might. Also, Parallels can’t take advantage of both cores on Core Duo chips. (The main exception is FireWire drives that have been mounted in OS X.) If you have peripherals that rely on these technologies and that need access to them in Windows, you should consider using Boot Camp. There was some stuttering of the sound and the occasional mild picture hiccup, but overall, the experience was much better than I was expecting.What hardware won’t work with Parallels? Pretty much anything that connects via FireWire, Bluetooth, or ExpressCard.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorRui ArchivesCategories |